I think much of my issue around the Content Warning culture on Mastodon, is the vocabulary. "Content Warning" has a very specific meaning in other contexts. Here, it is more like "Content Filter" or "Subject Line," to give readers a choice to expand or not.
This feels wrong, because of other contexts where majority folks have tried to express trauma or pain at even having to hear about the racism that impacted me. Feels very much like "Ban teaching civil rights, so white kids don't feel bad."
The issue of "Most white folk don't want to hear about your racism" is a related but separate issue. I don't think forcing people whose ears aren't open (or aren't open right now) to hear what they don't want to hear is fruitful anyway.🤷🏿♂️
Over the years, a bunch of folks said I helped them become less racist. That's not true. I don't have that power. I wish I did! They made themselves less racist.
What happened was, they opened their own ears, and then they could hear what I was saying.
@mekkaokereke which thing feels wrong, the UX mechanics you're describing or the name/description as a content warning? (I agree there's a mismatch, it's more like a heads up.)
@knowtheory Two things feel wrong:
The name of "Content Warning." This puts using the feature in the same bucket as not showing depictions of gore, or content that can trigger PTSD.
And the guidance to use the feature. Someone saying "Put a content Warning on that!" on issues of describing racism, feels a lot like "Descriptions of you existing as a Black person cause me trauma on the same level as other stuff that should be behind Content Warnings! You just harshed my vibes!"
You'll notice that in US society, Black people experience more repercussions for speaking about racism, than racists get for being racist:
* Kaepernick, fired and unhire-able
* Jemele Hill, fired
* Black employees at Coinbase, let go/asked to leave
* Inmates at Rikers who complained, email and letters taken away
So the "Hide your distasteful Black experiences" message gets mixed up in the "Use subjects" message, in a way that makes people understandably upset.
@mekkaokereke Oh yeah, i agree completely. I think the fediverse has some serious unresolved issues with what it means to be in a community with people experiencing different things than you. It manifests in other places too, but the CW features bring it to the fore here.
@mekkaokereke I totally understand that. It's just that a lot of the Fediverse is non-American (at least in its origin, especially Mastodon) so some of your concerns might be rather new to a lot of people.
If it helps to rephrase CW as Content Filter/CF, maybe suggest this to the admins. For me, if I see a CW warning I read the title and, in 9 out of 10 times I open the stuff, when I'm in the right headspace.
@thisNina @mekkaokereke @jynersolives the problem is that it is trying to be too many things. I would love if all toots had to be wrapped in some kind of topic. It would make it so much easier to scroll past things I wasn't interested in. But it's optional, and called a content warning, which has cultural baggage. (also bugging people because they post things you aren't interested in is an AH move)
@siw that is what I have been doing, aside from replies. It's even a setting as the default on my app.
Right, but what if it weren't a choice, and it were called a headline. That would be a lot more compelling.
@siw People would be finding incorrect but somehow useful ways of (mis)using this feature within days.
@StatsJew @siw I've been using the feature in that way, too. I'm not sure how a "title" or "subject line" such as "table tennis" or "trombone" could offend anyone. It occurs to me someone who has bad intent will make that clear one way or another. I think CW is just a technical feature, not a direct cause of problems.
@thisNina @mekkaokereke @StatsJew @jynersolives The combination of words are loaded for those in the United States. Most people think they mean only certain things so get understandably upset when their own experiences are equated with those.
Describing this badly.
Best I can do.
Maybe someone else willing would like to try.
@mekkaokereke @knowtheory Well-stated, and frankly, with this last read, I'm out. Mastodon promised a curated local thread, and I intentionally only followed like 12 Black people for some relief from the incessant mainstream neediness and fragility and control and insistence on being affirmed and exonerated and euphoric at all times of every day. It hasn't been a week, and my timeline already is filled with Black people defending speaking about daily life. To each other. Out.
@mekkaokereke @knowtheory I agree. I am new here, and I can’t log-into the browser (no idea what is wrong!) to see all of the features, BUT, I think that I read you can turn off the trigger warning label for posts you receive. It is in the settings. I intend to turn mine off for the very reason you discussed. P.S. Use hashtags so more people will see your posts. #BlackMastodon
@mekkaokereke @knowtheory I'm a journalist with PTSD who supports content warnings as the term has commonly been understood, but on Mastodon I've been scolded for questioning whether this feature should be used as a subject line on "political" and other posts. If Mastodon Content Warnings are really just subject lines, then Mastodon has no mechanism for effective content warnings.
@davenicolette @mekkaokereke @knowtheory if the current CW feature was renamed "subject line" or something, a new CW feature might work like a redaction bar, hiding an arbitrary string of text in the post and replacing it with a few words of the user's choosing until clicked upon. Maybe this could be misused in ways I haven't thought of, however.
A good few defending CWs, and I agree that it reduces relentless exposure to everything, keeping in mind a lot of people’s psyche is wrecked from Twitter.
But, putting a headline/subject like “racism” is a clear call out. People choose to engage with it, which makes it more meaningful, and from my experience on the .ie instance, we’re here to support minorities and inclusion. I ask that ye keep calling out your trouble whichever way 💪
@mekkaokereke Even a wider "please put CW on politics" feels distasteful to me - too much of the Twitter classic "I follow you for your professional output, not your personal politics" feel.
@mekkaokereke "content warning" does seem like a good umbrella term for the whole range of "potential trigger" to "spoiler for some ancient TV show". Just because in one context it has mostly been used for more serious topics, it still feels wrong to sort of "monopolise" the term for that context alone.
@mekkaokereke If it's some random person asking you to add content warnings, I'd just ignore them or tell them where to go; and if it's the server admin or server rules, find a better server.
It's not a great mechanism, would be better I think if each user can specify how they want to filter their feed and what they want to see or don't, without requiring people to add content warning headers, which isn't reliable anyway.
@mekkaokereke if I didn't want to hear about some topics I can always filter them (especially since there seem to be filters that can add content warning on the receiving end, not sure if that's an official feature but still), we definitely need to get rid of this effort of silencing people's lived experiences even if they aren't pleasant
@mekkaokereke 💯 for all of this - so many of the problems 🐦 ies have here could have been hugely mitigated with better explanation/wording. 😬
But also, our (people like me) need/entitlement to go be cops & missionaries at strangers needs to stop.
The absurdity of evangelicals trying to force the holy word of consent onto everyone we see would be hilarious if it wasn't being used as straight up harassment. 🙁
@mekkaokereke A large part of the problem that some white people have is that they do not see themselves as overtly racist. The imagine that racism is attending Klan rallies. Actively hating people. They don't see or understand the systems they take part in that result in systemic racism.
Innuendo Studio recently released an excellent video that details this very issue. Well worth the view.
@mekkaokereke They opened their ears, which opened their minds, culminating in opening their hearts.
Why anyone would judge a group of people for something out of their control is beyond me. A good hearted person abhors the judgement of anyone unless they have personal experience with that person that is impossible to forgive. And that should never include race, gender, who they love, age, or political affiliation. People are more complex than anything observable superficially.
@mekkaokereke That's true, but it's also true that if you hadn't been there, saying what you said to them, they might never have been motivated or even able to open their ears.
To my shame, I raise my hand as a classic example of learning far too late how racist I was despite thinking I was not (then,and know now, must still be).
I am grateful beyond measure for those who persisted in educating me, confronting it, sometimes brutally, but always convincingly.
@mekkaokereke How do you feel about Daryl Davis? He seems to be a divisive figure, but he also seems to be very talented at creating the initial trust that opens ears. I suppose it could still be individuals opening ears over time, but he sure seems like he reached a lot of people while flying solo. Perhaps more than you would expect to open their ears on their own.
Good for him, but I don't spend time talking to those types of racists, for several reasons. The most important of which, is that cartoonishly evil klan type racism is insignificant compared to the racism done by people that don't think of themselves as racist.
A lot of white folk think "People that say the N word are racist, and therefore, if I don't say the N-Word, I'm not racist."
I talk more about things like systemic racism that the rest of us contribute to.
@mekkaokereke That makes a lot of sense. I couldn’t help but be impressed by what he achieved, but even if you had to go after the cartoonishly evil subset, it would still need a lot of people, because humans don’t scale well. I suspect it is possible to achieve more by targeting the non-conscious racists since they tend to have more influence/reach anyway.
@mekkaokereke I want to be less racist. I don’t like having that junk floating around in my head. I appreciate when folks point out when I’m acting or speaking with those old programmed scripts that hurt others
Everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct! Thank you. Mastodon.cloud is maintained by Sujitech, LLC.