Automation progressively transfers income from labour to technologists to capitalists. Absent a shared wealth approach — say, national capital allotment — you'll have to pursue ever more tortured, and toxic, definitions of property, enclosures, and ham-fisted and draconian exclusionary regimes.

If your creatives and labourers are assured sufficient consistent income, IP becomes a ... patently ... irrellevant burdenous obstruction. Which it is.

archive.org/details/engineersa

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_in

@dredmorbius This reminds me of the proposals for coupling free-trade agreements with redistribution to counter the effect that free-trade agreements tend to both increase the total wealth AND transfer that wealth from working class to capital.

@dredmorbius Automation is never the issue, who owns the automation & it's output is very much so!

I think that's the luddite stance.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
mastodon.cloud

Everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct! Thank you. Mastodon.cloud is maintained by Sujitech, LLC.