@amiloradovsky@functional.cafe Fair point. I was short-cutting the longer argument:

Capabilities of sufficient richness have a minimum complexity requirement. More complexity is a necessary but not _sufficient_ requirement for such capabilities -- it's possible to have complexity _without_ deliviering a specific property. It's _not_ possibly to have that property without the requisite complexity.

Complexity -- more parts, interactions, minimum tolerances -- increases odds of failure.

@namark @fsi

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Everyone is welcome as long as you follow our code of conduct! Thank you. Mastodon.cloud is maintained by Sujitech, LLC.