In an information-saturated environment, the observer's most critical faculty is not perception, but rejection. The capacity to rapidly and with low cost reject unneccessary, useless, or bogus signals or messages, below the level of consciousness if at all possible....
In the twenty-first century censorship works by flooding people with irrelevant information. We just don't know what to pay attention to, and often spend our time investigating and debating side issues. In ancient times having power meant having access to data. Today having power means knowing what to ignore.
~ Yuval Noah Harari
@dredmorbius precisely. This fits with what Byung-Chul Han was writing about in his book In the Swarm 👍🏿
@Gotterdammerung @dredmorbius in his book 'Amusing Ourselves to Death' Neil Postman recounts how the invention of the telegraph gave rise to the concept of 'daily news' ie whatever had come through the telegraph wires that day (thus "newswire"), often delivered without context or analysis. When I read that I immediately thought of "social media" ...
@strypey The lessons, parallels, and crucially, /differences/ we can learn from the age of telegraphy are tremendous.
Of the first: it was digital, lightspeed, required transmission lines and links, was peer-to-peer, and rapidly developed into networks. Interruption and interception were possible (and instrumental in numerous events). It was store-and-forward.
Costs though were high, BW and access limited.
It changed culture, business, politics, language.
In the 18th & 19th century American discourse was centered in typography, it was content-laden and serious. But telegrams eroded this by mid-19th century, and photography sped up this erosion until television radically transformed public discourse by mid-20th century.
@dredmorbius @Gotterdammerung is there any web video available of talks by Joanna Yates on this? Sounds like that would be a great addition to this list:
Generalistic and moderated instance.