@AndrewYang@twitter.com Sure, UBI is a concept that has worked at smaller scale. I'm not inherently against it.
But you can't propose this and assume that the next-level recipients (retail, housing, utilities) won't jack up prices to consume the new income. They will do it if they can get away with it.
Adding UBI without safeguards to prevent abuse by that next level will basically turn it into a handout for retail, housing, and utilities, putting us right back at Square 1.
Show me a UBI proposal that DOES address these issues. You want to make America think harder, right?
Someone on here tried to keep steering a conversation like this towards "well, people will try home ownership more!"
Yeah, that's not a solution. That's a wishful-thinking attitude borne out of suburbia. Come see how people live in an actual urban center first.
So again, UBI itself is not bad. But it's PART of a solution. What's your WHOLE solution, @AndrewYang@twitter.com? /fin
This, btw, is why you're having trouble reaching truly progressive and younger people.
We don't trust businesses to Do The Right Thing. If they can get away with highway robbery, THEY WILL.
UBI without protections is useless; and may well end up *expanding* wealth inequality.
[Notice Regarding the Transfer of the mstdn.jp / mastodon.cloud Services] We have received several inquiries showing interest in a transfer following the announcement of the end of the mstdn.jp and mastodon.cloud services. As a result of subsequently evaluating the situation and making preparations, we have decided that the corresponding services will be transferred to Sujitech, LLC. on June 30. Thank you.